Ventha Seng et al v. Eric Holder et al
| Jackey Ny and Ventha Seng |
| Hilary Clinton, Does, Eric Holder and US Consular Section of US Embassy |
| 8:2011cv01634 |
| October 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Other Immigration Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
[IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The Court ORDERS Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than July 12, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: (See document for further details.) Plaintiff shall move this case forward or it will be dismissed. (rla)
|
|
Filing
4
[IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/6/2012. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: A proof of proper service of the summons and complaint on defendant(s); Papers properly seeking entry of default or a default judgment; Answers or other filings by the defendant(s). (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
