Gas Engineering, LLC v. Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Gas Engineering, LLC v. Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd

Gas Engineering, LLC v. Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd

Plaintiff:	Gas Engineering, LLC
Defendant:	Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd
Case Number:	8:2011cv01889
Filed:	December 7, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge:	David O. Carter
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 16, 2017	Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: FAILURE TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS by Judge David O. Carter. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to file dismissal documents, or in the alternative, a status report explaining why this case has not yet resolved, on or before August 28, 2017. *Refer to Order. (es)
March 19, 2012	Filing 3 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than March 31, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint as to defendant. (rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 16, 2017

Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: FAILURE TO FILE DISMISSAL DOCUMENTS by Judge David O. Carter. Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to file dismissal documents, or in the alternative, a status report explaining why this case has not yet resolved, on or before August 28, 2017. *Refer to Order. (es)

March 19, 2012

Filing 3 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than March 31, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint as to defendant. (rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gas Engineering, LLC v. Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gas Engineering, LLC
Represented By:	Keyvan Samini
Represented By:	Dina McKenzie Simmons
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Hangzhou Hangyang Cryogenic Liquefy Equipment Co., Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?