Cabo Brands Inc v. MAS Beverage Inc et al
Plaintiff: Cabo Brands Inc
Defendant: Does and MAS Beverage Inc
Case Number: 8:2011cv01911
Filed: December 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER DENYING MASS MOTION FOR PRELMINARY INJUNCTION 65 by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc). Modified on 12/4/2012 (lc).
November 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING CROSS DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 72 by Judge Otis D Wright, II: The Court hereby DISMISSES the Crossdefendants Worldwide Spirits, Inc., Worldwide Beverage Imports, LLC, Universal Brands and Imports, LLC, Drinks Americas, Inc., and Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd.from this case. Further, Fabrica De Tequilas Finos S.A. De, Federico G. Cabo, and Richard F.Cabo are DISMISSED from this case. Finally, MASs fifth cause of action for unjust enrichment is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety, including with respect to Cabo. (lc) .Modified on 11/14/2012 (lc).
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER RE Mas Beverages MOTION for preliminary injunction 65 and Cabo Brands MOTION to dismiss Mas's counterclaim 72 AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Otis D Wright II:Both Cabo and Mas failed to timely oppose the respective motions. Such inac tion may be deemed consent to the granting of the motion. L.R 7-12.The parties are hereby given a second chance to oppose these two motions by filing oppositions no later than Friday, September 28, 2012. If the parties so desire, they may file replie s to the oppositions, but these must be filed in accordance with the original schedule,that is, by Monday, October 1, 2012. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed consent to the granting of the motion. L.R 7-12. Further, Mas is hereby ORDERED T O SHOW CAUSE why allcounterdefendants, other than Cabo, should not be dismissed for untimely service. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, counterdefendants must be served within 120 days after the countercomplaint is filed, or else the Court must dismiss the action without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The last day to effectuate service was July 14, 2012. The proofs of service filed by Mas show that these counterdefendants were served beyond the 120-day window. (ECF Nos. 6670.) Mas has 7 days to show good cause for this failure. Failure to respond or failure to show good cause will result in dismissal of these counterdefendants. (lc)
June 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: granting in part and denying in part 26 Cabo Brands, Inc. motion to dismiss MAS Beverages, Inc. counterclaims. (lc) Modified on 6/5/2012 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cabo Brands Inc v. MAS Beverage Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAS Beverage Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cabo Brands Inc
Represented By: Charles Menzies
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?