Ronald Reiswig v. Aref Fakhoury et al
| Ronald Reiswig |
| Camilla Harris and Aref Fakhoury |
| 8:2011cv01989 |
| December 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| George H. King |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 76 filed herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the operative First Amended Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (nbo)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge 55 by Judge George H. King: IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) petitioner's request for stay-and-abeyance is denied; and (2) respondent shall file an Answer to the remaining exhausted claims alleged in the First Amended Petition within sixty (60) days. denying 41 Request (twdb)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block, re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . (See document for details.) If petitioner still desires to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file an amended petition rectifying the deficiency discussed above within thirty days of the service date of this Order. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
