Richard Trevino v. Michael J Astrue

Richard Trevino v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Richard Trevino
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	8:2012cv00185
Filed:	February 3, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Presiding Judge:	S. James Otero
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2013	Filing 18 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED dollars and 00/100s ($4,500.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($350.00), subject to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiffs counsel. Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 17 (lmh)
February 20, 2013	Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 14 , 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2013

Filing 18 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED dollars and 00/100s ($4,500.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($350.00), subject to the terms of the above referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiffs counsel. Re: Stipulation for Attorney Fees 17 (lmh)

February 20, 2013

Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 14 , 15 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Trevino v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Trevino
Represented By:	Shanny J Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Jacob M Mikow
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney SA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?