Son Q Pham v. City of Long Beach

Son Q Pham v. City of Long Beach

Plaintiff:	Son Q Pham
Defendant:	City of Long Beach
Case Number:	8:2012cv00709
Filed:	May 4, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Presiding Judge:	Duty Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 31, 2012	Filing 2 In Chambers - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato: For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff Son Q. Pham is hereby ordered to show cause why the Magistrate Judge should not report and recommend to the Chief Judge that his in for ma pauperis requests 1 (IFP Requests) in the pending actions be denied, and why Pham should not be declared a vexatious litigant and barred from filing future IFP Requests or other papers without the pre-payment of the full filing fee or without th e approval of a Judge of this Court. Pham is ordered to comply with this OSC by: (1) filing a written response to this OSC no later than noontime, June 5, 2012, and (2) appearing in person before the Court at 10:00 a.m. sharp, June 7, 2012, in Courtroom 6B of this Court located at 411 W. 4th St., Santa Ana, California, 92701. (See document for further information.)(rla)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 31, 2012

Filing 2 In Chambers - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato: For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff Son Q. Pham is hereby ordered to show cause why the Magistrate Judge should not report and recommend to the Chief Judge that his in for ma pauperis requests 1 (IFP Requests) in the pending actions be denied, and why Pham should not be declared a vexatious litigant and barred from filing future IFP Requests or other papers without the pre-payment of the full filing fee or without th e approval of a Judge of this Court. Pham is ordered to comply with this OSC by: (1) filing a written response to this OSC no later than noontime, June 5, 2012, and (2) appearing in person before the Court at 10:00 a.m. sharp, June 7, 2012, in Courtroom 6B of this Court located at 411 W. 4th St., Santa Ana, California, 92701. (See document for further information.)(rla)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Son Q Pham v. City of Long Beach
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Son Q Pham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of Long Beach
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?