Glenn Provost, MD v. Attorneys from Paul Plevin Sullivan and Connaughton et al
| Glenn Provost, MD |
| Attorney Teal Anderson, Attorneys from Paul Plevin Sullivan and Connaughton, Attorneys from the University of California, Attorney Katrina Foley, Sandra McDonough, Richard Paul, Charles Robinson, Carolyn Yee, Jennifer Baumann, Does and Michael Etchepare |
| 8:2012cv00867 |
| June 1, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| James V. Selna |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than November 13, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A s an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Proof of service of summons and complaint as to defendants. Absen t a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. The Court hereby vacates the Scheduling Conference set for October 29, 2012 to be resent after resolution of the Order to Show Cause. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
