Secureauth Corporation v. Indirect Partners LLC et al
| Secureauth Corporation |
| Indirect Partners LLC, Does and Monty Holloway |
| 8:2012cv01026 |
| June 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| James V. Selna |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s) to Show Cause in writing no later than December 12, 2012 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause (OSC), on or before the above date: Proof of service of summons and complaint. (See document for further details.) The Court sets the Order to Show Cause for Hearing on December 17, 2012 at 11:30 a.m. The Court FURTHER CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference, set for November 26, 2012, to December 17, 2012 at 11:30 a.m. (rla)
|
|
Filing
4
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge James V. Selna, re Jurisdiction: The Court has made a preliminary review of the jurisdictional allegations in the Complaint, filed June 21, 2012. Presently, the Court cannot tell if jurisdiction has been pro perly invoked. Securewatch is ordered to file an amended initial pleading within 15 days identifying each member of each alleged LLC and the members citizenship and principal place of business as the date of the filing of the initial pleading. If any member is itself an LLC, the same information shall be provided for each subtier member, and if need be, for each successive subtier. A failure to respond may result in dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
