Digitech Image Technologies LLC et al v. Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd et al
Plaintiff: Digitech Image Technologies LLC
Defendant: Ricoh Company Ltd, Ricoh Americas Corporation, Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd and Pentax Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation
Case Number: 8:2012cv01689
Filed: October 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Wilner
Presiding Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II :In light of the Courts Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment (Digitech Image Techs., LLC v. Elecs. for Imaging, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-1324-ODW(MRWx) (C.D. Cal. July 31, 2013) (ECF No. 88)) and the parties repres entations in their August 5, 2013 Joint Status Report (Id. (ECF No. 90)), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Digitech Image Technologies, LLC shall take nothing; 2. Judgment for each of the Defendants in this and the related cases. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 31 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 7/31/2013.(lc).
January 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSOLIDATE DISCOVERY RE ALL DIGITECH MATTERS PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT AND ORDER THEREON by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (see document for specifics). (lc). Modified on 1/31/2013 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Digitech Image Technologies LLC et al v. Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricoh Company Ltd
Represented By: Bruce D Kuyper
Represented By: Patrick S Park
Represented By: Richard de Bodo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricoh Americas Corporation
Represented By: Bruce D Kuyper
Represented By: Patrick S Park
Represented By: Richard de Bodo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pentax Ricoh Imaging Co Ltd
Represented By: Bruce D Kuyper
Represented By: Patrick S Park
Represented By: Richard de Bodo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pentax Ricoh Imaging Americas Corporation
Represented By: Patrick S Park
Represented By: Bruce D Kuyper
Represented By: Richard de Bodo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Digitech Image Technologies LLC
Represented By: John J Edmonds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?