Brandi Passante v. Hunter Moore et al
Plaintiff: Brandi Passante
Defendant: John Does and Hunter Moore
Case Number: 8:2012cv01866
Filed: October 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Brandi Passante against Hunter Moore (twdb)
January 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 (In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s) to show cause (OSC) in writing no later than February 13, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecut ion. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Answer by the defendant(s) OR plaintiff's request for entry of default. (See document for further details.) The Court hereby VACATES the Scheduling Conference, set for January 28, 2013, pending the outcome of the Order to Show Cause. (rla)
December 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CIVIL CONTEMPT SANCTIONS by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Hunter Moore shall show cause unless Defendant waives the right to do so, before the Hon orable Judge James V. Selna of the United States District Court for the Central District of California located at Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Room 1053, Santa Ana, California on January 8, 2013 at 1:15 p.m. why Defendant should not be held in civil contempt for Defendant's failure to comply with the October 26, 2012 Temporary Restraining Order and the November 20, 2012 Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff shall make service upon the Defe ndant of the Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt and all supporting papers forthwith. Defendant shall file and serve, either personally or electronically, any response to the Order to Show Cause no later than December 21, 2012. Plaintiff may file and se rve, either personally or electronically, a reply no later than January 3, 2013. Should Defendant be found in contempt, the Court will consider appropriate remedies, including the imposition of escalating monetary sanctions and/or incarceration, each for the purpose of securing Defendants compliance with this Court's Orders. (rla)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brandi Passante v. Hunter Moore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hunter Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandi Passante
Represented By: Linda S McAleer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?