Robert P Mosier v. Steven C Canup

Robert P Mosier v. Steven C Canup

Plaintiff:	Robert P Mosier
Defendant:	Steven C Canup
Case Number:	8:2013cv00206
Filed:	February 6, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge:	Philip S. Gutierrez
Nature of Suit:	Negotiable Instrument

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 13, 2013	Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On April 23, 2013, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why the abovecaptioned action should not be dismissed for lack of prosec ution. See Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff was ordered to respond in writing by filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment no later than May 1, 2013. On April 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Defau lt Judgment, but the document was stricken for failure to comply with the Courts Local Rules. See Dkts. # 11, 13-14. Because Plaintiff attempted to timely respond to the Courts OSC, the Court grants Plaintiff an additional thirty days to respond. Acc ordingly, the Court will consider the filing of a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by June 12, 2013 as an appropriate response to the OSC. Failure to respond in writing may result in dismissal of the action. RE:( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/12/2013.) (lw)
April 23, 2013	Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before May 1, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date, as anappropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action: Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff. (lw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 13, 2013

Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On April 23, 2013, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause ("OSC") why the abovecaptioned action should not be dismissed for lack of prosec ution. See Dkt. # 10. Plaintiff was ordered to respond in writing by filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment no later than May 1, 2013. On April 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Defau lt Judgment, but the document was stricken for failure to comply with the Courts Local Rules. See Dkts. # 11, 13-14. Because Plaintiff attempted to timely respond to the Courts OSC, the Court grants Plaintiff an additional thirty days to respond. Acc ordingly, the Court will consider the filing of a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment or a Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by June 12, 2013 as an appropriate response to the OSC. Failure to respond in writing may result in dismissal of the action. RE:( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/12/2013.) (lw)

April 23, 2013

Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing on or before May 1, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following on or before the above date, as anappropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond in writing, may result in the dismissal of the entire action: Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff OR Request to Clerk for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff. (lw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert P Mosier v. Steven C Canup
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert P Mosier
Represented By:	Lance A Brewer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Steven C Canup
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?