Thomas Hardy v. Toshiba America Information Systems Inc
Plaintiff: Thomas Hardy
Defendant: Toshiba America Information Systems Inc
Case Number: 8:2013cv00516
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY AND INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth re: 34 . (See Order for details.) (wr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas Hardy v. Toshiba America Information Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Toshiba America Information Systems Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Hardy
Represented By: Cory S Fein
Represented By: Cynthia B Chapman
Represented By: Michael A Caddell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?