Del Webb's Coventry Homes, Inc. et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company et al
Del Webb's Coventry Homes, Inc., Del Webb's Coventry Homes Construction Co., Anthem Arizona, LLC, Pulte Development Corporation and Pulte Home Corporation |
National Union Fire Insurance Company, Maryland Casualty Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Federated Service Insurance Company, Does, American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Steadfast Insurance Company |
8:2013cv01330 |
August 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gary A. Feess |
Stephen J. Hillman |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 162 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE: EX PARTE MOTION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULEFOR MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Del Webb has failed to show that it would suffer irreparable harm if the current ex parte relief was not granted and has cont ributed to the need for such relief and National Union has shown that granting such relief would cause them significant prejudice. Accordingly, Del Webb's request for ex parte relief to establish a briefing scheduling to allow the Court to decide and rule on Del Webb's Motion to Dismiss before the Court rules on National Union's pending Motion for Summary Judgment 155 is DENIED. See document for details. (smo) (Entered: 11/10/2014) (smo) |
Filing 157 ORDER to Continue Motion and Briefing Schedule Dates with Regard to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend First Amended Complaint by Judge Gary A. Feess. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Del Webb's Motion For Leave to Amend First Amended Complaint 131 and corresponding briefing schedule be continued as follows:1. Del Webb's Motion is continued to Monday, December 15, 2014 at 9:30 AM; 2. National Union shall file a response to the Motion on or before Monday, November 24, 2014; and 3. Del Webb shall file a reply to the on or before Monday, December 1, 2014. (smo) |
Filing 5 MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess. Plaintiffs have failed to properly aver that jurisdiction is proper in the present action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismis sed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction....Plaintiff'sresponse is due by the close of business on Friday, October 4, 2013. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to dismissal of the action. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) Response to Order to Show Cause due by 10/4/2013. (lw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.