Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLC v. Qualcomm Techonologies Inc et al
Plaintiff: Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLC
Defendant: Qualcomm Techonologies Inc and Marvell Semiconductor Inc
Case Number: 8:2013cv01535
Filed: September 30, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 88 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II .(lc). Modified on 9/4/2014 (lc).
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER SETTING TECHNOLOGY TUTORIAL by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:The Court SETS a technology tutorial in both actions for Wednesday, July 16, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.The tutorial will be off the record and not transcribed. The parties shall lodge with the Court all materials utilized in the technology tutorial in advance of the proceeding.The parties must lodge the materials for the Courts review by Wednesday, July 9, 2014. (lc). Modified on 6/23/2014. (lc).
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PLEADING 59 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS Progressives Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. However, to the extent that Progressive seeks a modification of this Courts Scheduling Order, the Motion is DENIED.Progressive shall file the Third Amended Complaint within 48 hours of this Order. (lc). Modified on 6/16/2014 .(lc).
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. FILING OF THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court ORDERS Progressive Semiconductor to SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than Tuesday, May 13, 2014, why this Court should not strike the TAC. No hearing will be held on this matter. Failure to respond will result in the Court striking the third amended complaint. (lc)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER SEVERING CASES AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT MARVELL SEMICONDUCTORINC. WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court therefore DENIES the parties stipulation 44 and DISMISSES Defendant Marvell Semiconductor WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Progress ive Semiconductor shall have 14 days to file an amended complaint against Qualcomm Technologies and a new civil action against Marvell Semiconductor. Once the Court receives these documents, it will issue a scheduling order in the Marvell Semiconductor action and coordinate the two cases for all purposes except trial. (lc). Modified on 3/3/2014. (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLC v. Qualcomm Techonologies Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qualcomm Techonologies Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marvell Semiconductor Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Progressive Semiconductor Solutions LLC
Represented By: Brandon C Fernald
Represented By: David A Skeels
Represented By: Jonathan T Suder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?