Eclipse IP LLC v. Dolls Kill Inc
Eclipse IP LLC |
Dolls Kill Inc |
8:2013cv01855 |
November 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Douglas F McCormick |
George H Wu |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order) (bp) |
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Woods, Tyler) |
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): by Judge George H. Wu; The Court VACATES the Order to Show Cause #11 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
![]() |
Filing 10 DEFAULT BY CLERK ENTERED as to *Defendant Dolls Kill Inc* (pj) |
Filing 9 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Dolls Kill Inc filed by plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Tyler J Woods)(Woods, Tyler) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC, upon Defendant Dolls Kill Inc served on 12/9/2013, answer due 12/30/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Dolls Kill, Inc. c/o Corporation Service Company, registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Woods, Tyler) |
Filing 7 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu. 1. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth Local Rules) 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (See order for details.) (kti) |
![]() |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Eclipse IP LLC. (et) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (et) (mg). |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (et) (mg). |
Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Dolls Kill Inc. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Dolls Kill Inc. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (Filing fee $ 400 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/5/2013: #1 Part 2) (mg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eclipse IP LLC v. Dolls Kill Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eclipse IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Scott J Ferrell |
Represented By: | Tyler J Woods |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dolls Kill Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.