Gary W Lewis v. Superior Court of California County of Orange et al
| Gary W Lewis |
| Stephen L Snyder, Clay M Smith, Penny A Lewis, Erick L Larsh and Superior Court of California County of Orange |
| 8:2014cv00081 |
| January 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Before the Court is the motion of Defendants Stephen L. Snyder and Penny A. Lewis ("Moving Defendants") to dismiss. Dkt. # 5. The Court finds this mat ter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.R. 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers, the Court GRANTS Moving Defendants' motion.....Plaintiff, like the Confederated Tribes, is attempting t o appeal an interlocutory state court decision. Under the principles articulated in Confederated Tribes, this Court cannot hear that appeal, even when it is characterized as a suit for declaratory judgment. See id. at 1141-42. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED.re: MOTION to Quash SERVICE; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Dismiss Complaint 5 ., Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
