Sentinel Offender Services, LLC v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sentinel Offender Services, LLC
Defendant: DOES and G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Case Number: 8:2014cv00298
Filed: February 28, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jean P. Rosenbluth
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 215 AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Judgment is entered on Plaintiff Sentinel Offender Services, LLC's First Amended Complaint as follows: a. In favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant G4S Secure Soluti ons (USA) Inc. in the amount of $456,328 in damages on Plaintiff's fraud and negligent misrepresentation claims, in addition to post-judgment interest at a rate set by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a); and b. In favor of Defendant and against Plain tiff on Plaintiff's breach of contract and breach of representations and warranties claims. 2. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over motions and applications for attorneys' fees and costs in the above-titled action. (mt)
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 195 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, in favor of Sentinel Offender Services, LLC against G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. Related to: Order on Motion to Amend/Correct 194 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
January 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 187 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Josephine L. Staton. For the foregoing reasons, Sentinel is entitled to $456,328 in damages plus statutory interest on its breach of contract, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation claims. Sentinel shall submit a proposed judgment forthwith. (dro)
April 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . (See Order for details) [Note Changes Made By The Court] (bem)
June 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton: granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss Case. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sentinel Offender Services, LLC v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc.
Represented By: Bradley Joseph Hamburger
Represented By: Theane Evangelis Kapur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sentinel Offender Services, LLC
Represented By: Joanne M Frasca
Represented By: John D Van Ackeren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?