CATR Co., Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District CATR Co., Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc

CATR Co., Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc

Plaintiff:	CATR Co., Ltd.
Defendant:	Kingston Technology Company, Inc
Case Number:	8:2014cv01352
Filed:	August 22, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge:	Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 16, 2021	Filing 426 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Defendant Kingston Technology Company, Inc., has infringed claims, 1, 4, and 24 of U.S. PATENT nO. 6,926,544; (2) Kingston's infringement was will ful;; (3) Claims 1, 4, and 24 of the '544 patent are not invalid; (4) The '544 patent is not unenforceable on the grounds of estoppel, waiver, equitable estoppel, unclean hands, failure to comply with 35 USC Sub-section 111or 116, or inequi table conduct.; (50 Pavo is awarded compensatory damages from and against Kingston in the amount of $7,515,327.40; (6) Pavo is awarded enhanced damages from and against Kingston of 50 percent of the compensatory damages for Kingston's will ful infringement in theamount of $3,757,663.70; (7) Pavo is awarded pre-judgment interest applicable to the compensatorydamages award, at the prime rate, from the date of first infringement, in May 2010, until March 16, 2021 (the date of entry of judgment), in the amount of $2,286,238.17; (see document for further information). The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
April 11, 2018	Filing 68 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, re Stipulation for Protective Order 64 . (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 16, 2021

Filing 426 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, the Court hereby ORDERS and ENTERS JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Defendant Kingston Technology Company, Inc., has infringed claims, 1, 4, and 24 of U.S. PATENT nO. 6,926,544; (2) Kingston's infringement was will ful;; (3) Claims 1, 4, and 24 of the '544 patent are not invalid; (4) The '544 patent is not unenforceable on the grounds of estoppel, waiver, equitable estoppel, unclean hands, failure to comply with 35 USC Sub-section 111or 116, or inequi table conduct.; (50 Pavo is awarded compensatory damages from and against Kingston in the amount of $7,515,327.40; (6) Pavo is awarded enhanced damages from and against Kingston of 50 percent of the compensatory damages for Kingston's will ful infringement in theamount of $3,757,663.70; (7) Pavo is awarded pre-judgment interest applicable to the compensatorydamages award, at the prime rate, from the date of first infringement, in May 2010, until March 16, 2021 (the date of entry of judgment), in the amount of $2,286,238.17; (see document for further information). The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the above-captioned case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

April 11, 2018

Filing 68 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, re Stipulation for Protective Order 64 . (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CATR Co., Ltd. v. Kingston Technology Company, Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CATR Co., Ltd.
Represented By:	Robert A Conley
Represented By:	Daniel R Ferri
Represented By:	Christopher J Lee
Represented By:	Mark B Mizrahi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kingston Technology Company, Inc
Represented By:	Christine Hwang Yang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?