Mohammad Ali Hedayati v. The Judge Law Firm
Mohammad Ali Hedayati |
The Judge Law Firm |
8:2014cv01483 |
September 15, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O. Carter |
Arthur Nakazato |
Consumer Credit |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 JUDGMENT 31 by Judge David O. Carter: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 68, Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff individually against Defendant in the sum of $1,001.00 plus reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (lwag) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mohammad Ali Hedayati v. The Judge Law Firm | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mohammad Ali Hedayati | |
Represented By: | Reza Torkzadeh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Judge Law Firm | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.