Maribel Alvarado v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Maribel Alvarado v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Maribel Alvarado v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Maribel Alvarado
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	8:2014cv01510
Filed:	September 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge:	Suzanne H. Segal
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 26, 2015	Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 18 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($4,900.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (mr)
June 29, 2015	Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the above-captioned action is REMANDED with instructions to the Commissioner to award benefits consistent with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed in connection with this Judgment. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 16 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 26, 2015

Filing 19 ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 18 . IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($4,900.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED dollars and 00/CENTS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (mr)

June 29, 2015

Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and that the above-captioned action is REMANDED with instructions to the Commissioner to award benefits consistent with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed in connection with this Judgment. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 16 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maribel Alvarado v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maribel Alvarado
Represented By:	Manuel D Serpa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney SA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?