Trendsettah USA, Inc. et al vs- Swisher International Inc
| Trendsettah USA, Inc. and Trendsettah, Inc. |
| Swisher International, Inc. |
| 8:2014cv01664 |
| October 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| James V. Selna |
| Anti-Trust |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
596
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. The Court NOW ENTERS JUDGMENT AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs on all of Plaintiffs' claims, including Plaintiffs' claims for violation of Section 2 of the Sh erman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2; breach of contract; breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; violation of the Florida Antitrust Law, Fla. Stat. § 542.19; trade libel; tortious interference with contract; intentional interfer ence with prospective economic relations; negligent interference with prospective economic relations; and violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Profs. Code § 17200. (See document for details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
296
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna: The Court NOW ENTERS JUDGMENT AS FOLLOWS: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant on Plaintiffsclaims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fairdealing in the amount of $9,062,679.00 plus prejudgment interest if and to the extent ordered by the Court. See document for further information. (lwag)
|
|
Filing
216
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant on all of Plaintiffs' claims so tried before the jury; 2. As to Plaintiffs' claim for violation of Florida Antitrust Law, Fla. Stat. § ; 542.19, judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs; 3. Pursuant to a stipulation made on the record by the parties, because the amount of the antitrust damages exceeds the amount of the contract damages awarded by the jury, th e contract damages are reduced to zero; 4. Plaintiffs shall recover the antitrust damages awarded by the jury, which is automatically trebled to $44,446,482.00 pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15(a); and 5. Post-judgmen t interest shall run on this judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961. 6. As the prevailing parties, Plaintiffs shall recover their costs and reasonable attorney fees from Defendant to the extent ordered by the Court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
|
|
Filing
44
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick re Stipulation for Protective Order 43 . (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
