Meliton Ricardo Chavez et al v. United States of America et al
| Meliton Ricardo Chavez, Blanca Estela Ramirez, Maria Nunez, Maria Carolina Torres, Ana Maria Aguilar and Domingo Santos Velasquez |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stephen Thomas Busch, DOES 1 through 10, United States of America and United States Department of Justice |
| 8:2014cv01849 |
| November 20, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J Guilford |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Receipt of Full Satisfaction of Settlementfiled by Defendant United States of America. (Park, Richard) |
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, Approving Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Dismissal of Action #18 . (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Settlement Compromise Settlement and Dismissal of Action filed by DEFENDANT United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Park, Richard) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Approving Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendant's Time to Answer by 30 days #16 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant's answer due date be extended from June 8, 2015 to July 8, 2015. NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED WITHOUT A FURTHER VERY GOOD STRONG SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE. (mt)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to United States of America answer now due 7/8/2015, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by DEFENDANT United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Richard M Park added to party United States of America(pty:dft))(Park, Richard) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL United States of America pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice. (Park, Richard) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER correcting caption by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, re Notice (Other) #13 (twdb)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Substitution filed by DEFENDANTS Federal Bureau of Investigation. (Attachments: #1 Order Correcting Caption)(Park, Richard) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE: Order to Show Cause issued 3/30/15 is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Federal Bureau of Investigation answer now due 6/8/2015; Stephen Thomas Busch answer now due 6/8/2015, re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by DEFENDANTS Federal Bureau of Investigation; Stephen Thomas Busch.(Attorney Richard M Park added to party Stephen Thomas Busch(pty:dft), Attorney Richard M Park added to party Federal Bureau of Investigation(pty:dft))(Park, Richard) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Angel Carrazco, Jr. filed by Plaintiff Meliton Ricardo Chavez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Carrazco, Angel) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Meliton Ricardo Chavez, upon Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation served on 3/10/2015, answer due 5/9/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Richard M. Park. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Richard M. Park. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Richard M. Park. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Carrazco, Angel) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution. The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than April 17, 2015 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution (see order for further details). (dg)
|
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Meliton Ricardo Chavez, upon Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation served on 12/29/2014, answer due 1/19/2015. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Henry Felix in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Carrazco, Angel) |
| Filing 6 21/60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendants Stephen Thomas Busch, DOES 1-10, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (nbo) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Ana Maria Aguilar, Meliton Ricardo Chavez, Maria Nunez, Blanca Estela Ramirez, Maria Carolina Torres, Domingo Santos Velasquez. (Carrazco, Angel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (mba) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. (mba) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Ana Maria Aguilar, Meliton Ricardo Chavez, Maria Nunez, Blanca Estela Ramirez, Maria Carolina Torres, Domingo Santos Velasquez. (mba) (mba). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Stephen Thomas Busch, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato.(Filing fee $400 PAID), filed by plaintiff Blanca Estela Ramirez, Maria Carolina Torres, Ana Maria Aguilar, Meliton Ricardo Chavez, Domingo Santos Velasquez, Maria Nunez. (mba) (mba). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
