Daniel Scott v. HSS Inc. et al
| Daniel Scott |
| Does and HSS Inc. |
| 8:2014cv01911 |
| December 3, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court hereby finds the monetary settlement of $888,428.89 plus the payment of employer-side payroll taxes on the wage component of Individual Settlement Payments provided for in the Settlement to be fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court approves payment of $41,000 to Simpluris, Inc., the appointed Claims Administrator, for the services it has rendered and will render in administering the settlement as described more fully in th e Settlement Agreement; The Court approves payment of $18,750 to the California Labor & Workforce Development Agency as its share of penalties pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act, Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq.; The Court approves payment of $222,107.07 in Attorneys Fees to James Hawkins, APLC and litigation costs in the amount of $30,000. The Court hereby confirms Plaintiff as the class representatives and orders payment of $4,000 to the named Plaintiff for his service as the representative and for his release of claims contained in the Settlement. See Order for more information. Related to: 75 81 , RE: Order on Motion for Attorney Fees 83 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
