Aura McClain v. First Mortgage Corporation et al
| Aura McClain |
| CR Title Services, Inc., CitiMortgage, Inc., DOES, First American Title Insurance Company, First Mortgage Corporation, Hacienda Service Corporation, LPS Default Title and Closing, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., NBS Default Services, LLC and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC |
| 8:2015cv00002 |
| January 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton: On March 10, 2015 and March 25, 2015, the Court granted as unopposed the Motions to Dismiss filed by the various Defendants in this action (Motions to Dismiss, Docs. 8,12,15,17,19,23; Dismissal Orders, Docs. 20, 24.) Each Dismissal Order specified that Plaintiff had 21 days from the date of the Dismissal Order to file any Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint or the case would be administratively closed and judgment entered in favor of Defendants. Pl aintiff failed to file any Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint within the alloted time. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall recover nothing by way of her Complaint against Defendants. As the prevailing parties, Defendants are entitled to their costs. (lwag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
