Ivin Mood v. City of Costa Mesa et al
| Ivin Mood |
| City of Costa Mesa, City of Newport Beach, Tom Gazsi, Tom Hatch, Jay Johnson, Dave Kiff, Ron Lowenberg, Officer Olivas, Officer Pallas, Officer Selinski #P450, Officer Smith and Rob Sharpnack |
| 8:2015cv01154 |
| July 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 153 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice and without leave to amend. (iva)
|
|
Filing
113
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting 90 MOTION for Reconsideration (dts)
|
|
Filing
85
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER (a) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Compel, (b) Granting Request for Sanctions, and (c) Vacating May 18, 2017 Hearing [Dkt. 73] by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (dts)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 49 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Defendants have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 23 , 31 are DENIED. (ad)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
