Great American Insurance Company v. Sequoia Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Great American Insurance Company v. Sequoia Insurance Company

Great American Insurance Company v. Sequoia Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Great American Insurance Company
Defendant:	Sequoia Insurance Company
Case Number:	8:2015cv01161
Filed:	July 23, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	David O. Carter
Presiding Judge:	Charles F. Eick
Nature of Suit:	Insurance

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 27, 2016	Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Great American Insurance Company against Sequoia Insurance Company. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)
March 1, 2016	Filing 44 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Re: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Great American's Complaint 18 ; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Sequoia's Duty to Defe nd or Indemnify Millenium Comm. Mgt., Inc. 22 . For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Great American's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Great American's Complaint 18 and DENIES Sequoia's Motion for Summary Judgment [2 2] as to whether Sequoia had a duty to defend and breached that duty.Further, the Court DENIES Great American's Motion 18 concerning the equitablecontribution claims and GRANTS Great American's Motion as to its right to recover in equitable subrogation the $1 million Sequoia should have paid to settle the Underlying Action.(see document for further details) (mba)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 27, 2016

Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Great American Insurance Company against Sequoia Insurance Company. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)

March 1, 2016

Filing 44 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Re: Cross Motions for Summary Judgment Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Great American's Complaint 18 ; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Sequoia's Duty to Defe nd or Indemnify Millenium Comm. Mgt., Inc. 22 . For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Great American's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Great American's Complaint 18 and DENIES Sequoia's Motion for Summary Judgment [2 2] as to whether Sequoia had a duty to defend and breached that duty.Further, the Court DENIES Great American's Motion 18 concerning the equitablecontribution claims and GRANTS Great American's Motion as to its right to recover in equitable subrogation the $1 million Sequoia should have paid to settle the Underlying Action.(see document for further details) (mba)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Great American Insurance Company v. Sequoia Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Great American Insurance Company
Represented By:	Linda Bondi Morrison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sequoia Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?