Maurice Lucien Van Wyk v. Jeffrey Beard
Petitioner: Maurice Lucien Van Wyk
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Case Number: 8:2015cv01257
Filed: August 6, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen E. Scott
Presiding Judge: Beverly Reid O'Connell
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell: Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition and entire action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maurice Lucien Van Wyk v. Jeffrey Beard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Beard
Represented By: Angela M Borzachillo
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Maurice Lucien Van Wyk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?