Santa Ana Police Officers Association et al v. City of Santa Ana et al
| Santa Ana Police Officers Association and Corey Slayton |
| City of Santa Ana, Michael Claborn, Does, Douglas McGeachy, William Nimmo, Christopher Revere, Carlos Rojas and Santa Ana Police Department |
| 8:2015cv01280 |
| August 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE 121 AND REMANDING ACTION TO SUPERIOR COURT by Judge David O. Carter. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion. The Court STRIKES the first and third causes of action in Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint. In addition, the Court REMANDS this action, in which only Plaintiffs' state lawclaims for retaliation remain pending, to the Superior Court of California, County ofOrange. (see document for details). (Case Terminated. Made JS-6) (dro)
|
|
Filing
88
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Department, Carlos Rojas, Christopher Revere, William Nimmo, Michael Claborn and Douglas McGeach y with respect to all 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims upon which this Court has original jurisdiction and the remaining state claims (the second and third claims for relief in the Third Amended Complaint) are dismissed without prejudice subject to refiling in state court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER RE: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 41 by Judge David O. Carter: For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants Motion as to all of Plaintiffs § 1983 claims, and DISMISSES the remaining claims WITHOUT PREJUDICE subject to refiling in state court. Defendants are directed to file a proposed judgment, consistent with this Order on or before March 16, 2016. See document for further information.(lwag) Modified on 3/2/2016 (lwag).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
