Lotte International America Corporation et al v. Ezaki Glico USA Corporation et al
Lotte International America Corporation and Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd |
Ezaki Glico USA Corporation and Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha |
8:2015cv01320 |
August 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
Jay C Gandhi |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 attachment) (twdb) |
Filing 42 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A) filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation.(Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 41 STATUS REPORT (JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING NEW JERSEY CASE) filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 40 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation to Substitute Attorney Steven M. Levitan, Hogan Lovells, USA LLP as attorney of record for Ezaki defendants instead of Adrian J. Lee, Thomas R. Vuksinick, Matthew A. Barlow #39 . (see document for details). (dro) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Steven M. Levitan in place of attorney Adrian J. Lee filed by Attorney for Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order )(Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, granting Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #36 RE Steven M. Levilan, Hogan Lovells US LLP (twdb) |
Filing 37 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A), #35 by Judge Deborah Goltz. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by. (es) |
Filing 36 STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Steven M. Levilan in place of attorney Dean J. Zipser filed by Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Zipser, Dean) |
Filing 35 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Substitute Attorney G-01 #34 . The following error(s) was found: G-01 proposed order is missing. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 34 **STRICKEN PURSUANT TO #37 ** STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Steven M. Levitan in place of attorney Adrian J. Lee filed by Attorney for Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation.(Lee, Adrian) Modified on 6/13/2017 (es). |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney James R Cady on behalf of Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation (Attorney James R Cady added to party Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha(pty:dft), Attorney James R Cady added to party Ezaki Glico USA Corporation(pty:dft))(Cady, James) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Steven M Levitan on behalf of Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation (Levitan, Steven) |
Filing 31 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Steven M Levitan on behalf of Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation (Attorney Steven M Levitan added to party Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha(pty:dft), Attorney Steven M Levitan added to party Ezaki Glico USA Corporation(pty:dft))(Levitan, Steven) |
Filing 30 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Staying Case; Denying Without Prejudice Motion to Dismiss Complaint #23 by Judge David O. Carter: The parties are directed to file a joint report within ten (10) days of the New Jersey district court's resolution of the pending motion to transfer. If the New Jersey case is transferred to this District, the parties shall file a notice of related case and inform the Court how they wish to proceed with the two cases. If desired, Defendant may file a renewed Motion to Dismiss after the New Jersey district court's resolution of the motion to transfer. See document for further information. (lwag) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney Adina W. Stowell on behalf of Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. Filed by Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation (Attorney Adina Witzling Stowell added to party Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha(pty:dft), Attorney Adina Witzling Stowell added to party Ezaki Glico USA Corporation(pty:dft))(Stowell, Adina) |
Filing 28 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #23 . The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. Accordingly, the hearing set for 6/6/2016 is removed from the calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 27 DECLARATION of Matthew A. Barlow in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #23 filed by Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dictionary Definition of "Mind", #2 Exhibit B - Dictionary Definition of "Relate", #3 Exhibit C - Surrender of Registration for Cancellation)(Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 26 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #23 filed by Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. (Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 25 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint #23 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 24 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation, identifying Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha. (Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint filed by Defendant Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation. Motion set for hearing on 6/6/2016 at 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Proposed Order) (Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Adrian J Lee on behalf of Defendants Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha, Ezaki Glico USA Corporation (Attorney Adrian J Lee added to party Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha(pty:dft), Attorney Adrian J Lee added to party Ezaki Glico USA Corporation(pty:dft))(Lee, Adrian) |
Filing 21 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting Plaintiffs' Consent MOTION to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or otherwise Respond to Complaint by Twenty-One Days #20 . Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha answer due 5/4/2016; Ezaki Glico USA Corporation answer due 5/4/2016. (mt) |
Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 5/4/2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Consent Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Twenty-One Days) (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 19 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter granting #18 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer as to all defendants. This matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs Lotte International America Corporation and Lotte Confectionery Co., Ltd.'s Consent Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Fourteen Days. Having considered Plaintiffs' Consent Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Consent Motion is GRANTED. Defendants have until and including April 13, 2016, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. (dro) |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/13/2016 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Consent Motion to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint By Fourteen Days) (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha answer now due 3/30/2016; Ezaki Glico USA Corporation answer now due 3/30/2016, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Lotte International America Corporation; Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd.(Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Lotte International America Corporation, Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd. upon Ezaki Glico Kabushiki Kaisha waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/29/2015, answer due 2/29/2016; Ezaki Glico USA Corporation waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/29/2015, answer due 2/29/2016. Waiver of Service signed by Matthew A. Barlow. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 15 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter Granting granting #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint. This matter came before the Court on Plaintiffs Lotte International America Corporation and Lotte Confectionery Co., Ltd.'s Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint ("Motion"). Having considered Plaintiffs' Motion and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs have until and including February 15, 2016 to serve their Complaint on Defendants. (dro) |
Filing 14 Plaintiffs' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Consent Motion for Extention of Time to Serve Complaint)(Foster, Daniel) Modified on 12/4/2015 (lwag). |
Filing 13 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge David O. Carter: granting #12 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mary D. Hallerman on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Daniel R. Foster as local counsel. (lt) |
Filing 12 APPLICATION for attorney Mary D. Hallerman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-16307662 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd, Lotte International America Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order on Application on Non-Resident Attorney to Appear In a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice (Hallerman)) (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 11 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge David O. Carter: granting #6 APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney John J. Dabney on behalf of Plaintiffs, designating Daniel R. Foster as local counsel. (lt) |
Filing 10 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application emailed to Mary D. Hallerman for Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co Ltd and Lotte International America Corporation. Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application;no filing fee is required. You have been removed as counsel of record from this case for failure to submit this filing fee. (lwag) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lwag) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. (lwag) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for attorney John J. Dabney to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-16290490 paid.) filed by Plaintiff Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd., Lotte International America Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice (J. Dabney)) (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd., Lotte International America Corp.. Plaintiff's Notice of Pendency of Other Action Related Case(s): 2:15-cv-05477-MCA-LDW (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd., Lotte International America Corp., identifying Lotte Co., Ltd., Lotte Holdings Co. Ltd.. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd., Lotte International America Corp.. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd., Lotte International America Corp.. (Foster, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-16289904 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Lotte International America Corp., Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A, #2 Exhibit Ex. B, #3 Exhibit Ex. C, #4 Exhibit Ex. D, #5 Exhibit Ex. E, #6 Exhibit Ex. F, #7 Exhibit Ex. G, #8 Exhibit Ex. H, #9 Exhibit Ex. I, #10 Exhibit Ex. J, #11 Exhibit Ex. K) (Attorney Daniel R Foster added to party Lotte Confectionery Co. Ltd.(pty:pla), Attorney Daniel R Foster added to party Lotte International America Corp.(pty:pla))(Foster, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.