Carolyn Denise Espinoza v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff: Carolyn Denise Espinoza
Defendant: Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 8:2015cv01499
Filed: September 16, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R. Gary Klausner
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner, in favor of Carolyn W. Colvin against Carolyn Denise Espinoza Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carolyn Denise Espinoza v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Dennis J Hanna
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney SA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Denise Espinoza
Represented By: James Sung Pi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?