United States, for use of Integrated Energy, LLC v. Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. et al
| United States, for the use of Integrated Energy LLC |
| DOES, Siemens Government Technologies, Inc. and Siemens Industry, Inc. |
| 8:2015cv01534 |
| September 23, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| James V. Selna |
| Miller Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
365
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that based on the Court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, a judgment is hereby entered jointly and severally against Defendants Kip Funk, Funks Engineering , Pyrocon, Inc., and Pyrocon, LLC (collectively "Funks Defendants"). Plaintiff is hereby awarded damages jointly and severally against Defendants Kip Funk, Funks Engineering and Pyrocon, Inc. in the amount of $154,250.00. Dkt. [3 60]. Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to costs jointly and severally against the Funks Defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54 (d). This Court shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties arising out of this final judgment, including but not limited to enforcement of the judgment. (See document for further information) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
