Robert P. Mosier v. Christopher M. Lee et al
Robert P. Mosier |
Philip Andrews, Noojaew Cawte, Christopher M. Lee, Nepenthe Capital Management, Inc. and Tealuck Family Trust |
8:2015cv02110 |
December 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Josephine L. Staton |
Other Fraud |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, On December 22, 2016, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Plaintiff Robert P. Mosier, in his capacity as the Court-appointed permanent receiver over Capital Cove Bancorp LLC and its affiliate s and subsidiaries (the "Receiver"), on his first, second, and fifth claims for relief. (MSJ Order, Doc. 65.) On January 11, 2017, the Court dismissed the Receivers remaining claims for relief. (Dismissal Order, Doc. 70.) The Court hereby finds and orders as follows: *Refer to Order for details.* 65 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es) |
Filing 68 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT (Doc. 67 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton. The Court therefore ORDERS the Receiver to show cause as to why entry of judgment is appropriate at this time. The Receiver's d eclaration seeking dismissal of the remaining claims will be considered a sufficient reason for entry of judgment. The Receiver shall submit his declaration no later than five (5) days from the date of this Order. (see document for details). (dro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.