Lonnie D. Sampson v. Richard Tauer et al
| Lonnie D Sampson |
| Mark Bresee, Donna Brush, Vicki Hansen, James Jimenez, Marian Kim-Phelps, Penny Loomer, Mary Mangold, Khanh Nguyen, Jamison Power, Richard Tauer, Amy Walsh, Westminster Board of Trustees for Westminster School District and Erica Williams |
| 8:2015cv02158 |
| December 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T. Bristow |
| Michael W. Fitzgerald |
| Other Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald related to: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 64 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/21/2016. Plaintiff has failed to file a First Amended Complaint within the allotted time, nor has he requested an extension of time within which to do so. Accordingly, on or before November 21, 2016, plaintiff is ORDERED to (a) show good cause in writing, if any exists, why plaintiff has not filed his First Amended Complaint; or (b) file his First Amended Complaint; or (c) advise the Court that he does not desire to proceed with this action. (dc)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for Report and Recommendation 54 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss and Motions for More Definite Statem ents are granted; that Donna Brush's Joinder is denied as moot; that Mark Bresee's Motion to Set Aside Default and setting aside the Clerk's entry of default against Bresee is granted; that plaintiff's Motion for Extension is denied as moot; that the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend; and that plaintiff is ordered, if he still desires to pursue this action, to file a First Amended Complaint within (30) days of the date of this Order remedying the deficiencies discussed in the Report and Recommendation. (See document for further details.) (iva)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
