Nicholas Patrick v. Costa Mesa Police Dept. et al
| Nicholas Patrick |
| Costa Mesa Police Dept. and Orange County Sheriff's Dept |
| 8:2016cv00318 |
| February 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
281
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiff's Fifth Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, and this action is dismissed. 280 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)
|
|
Filing
189
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. no later than March 21, 2019, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Hahn for failure to prosecute and serve him. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER RE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams re Stipulation for Protective Order, 156 . (sbou)
|
|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the Order Accepting the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 48 , IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Pursuant to this Courts Order of April 7, 2016, plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $5.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of the or der (i.e., by May 9, 2016). The $5.00 partial filing fee has not been received by the Court. Accordingly, no later than June 24, 2016, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the required fee. Receipt of the partial $5.00 filing fee by the Court on or before June 24, 2016, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. (es)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
