John Ho v. SSK Investment LLC

John Ho v. SSK Investment LLC

Plaintiff:	John Ho
Defendant:	SSK Investment LLC
Case Number:	8:2016cv00629
Filed:	April 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	David O. Carter
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 11, 2016	Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $9,465.08. Defendant is enjoined to install an accessible parking space compliant with theAmericans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, including but not limited to installing a fully compliant access aisle; That the action be, and is hereby dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)
July 14, 2016	Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. According ly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than July 21, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (see document for details). (dro)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 11, 2016

Filing 24 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $9,465.08. Defendant is enjoined to install an accessible parking space compliant with theAmericans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, including but not limited to installing a fully compliant access aisle; That the action be, and is hereby dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

July 14, 2016

Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. According ly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than July 21, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (see document for details). (dro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Ho v. SSK Investment LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Ho
Represented By:	Pamela Tsao
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SSK Investment LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?