Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Karla Sandoval

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Karla Sandoval

Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Karla Sandoval

Plaintiff:	Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Defendant:	Karla Sandoval
Case Number:	8:2016cv00759
Filed:	April 21, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andre Birotte
Presiding Judge:	Michael R. Wilner
Nature of Suit:	Trademark

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 21, 2016	Filing 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Entrepreneur Media, Inc. and Defendant Karla Sandoval and Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 19 , the Court hereby ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
June 10, 2016	Filing 11 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before June 24, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 21, 2016

Filing 20 ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(II) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiff Entrepreneur Media, Inc. and Defendant Karla Sandoval and Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 19 , the Court hereby ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

June 10, 2016

Filing 11 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before June 24, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (iv)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Karla Sandoval
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Represented By:	Jennifer L Barry
Represented By:	Patrick Justman
Represented By:	Perry J Viscounty
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Karla Sandoval
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?