Marcus Floyd Thomas v. United States of America
Petitioner: Marcus Floyd Thomas
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 8:2016cv01025
Filed: June 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Guilford
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER DISMISSING MOTION Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(2) by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, Petitioners Motion to Vacate, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is DISMISSED without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcus Floyd Thomas v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcus Floyd Thomas
Represented By: Brianna Fuller Mircheff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Victoria A Degtyareva
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney SA-CR
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?