Michael Lawrence Lhevan v.Cynthia Nichols

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Michael Lawrence Lhevan v.Cynthia Nichols

Michael Lawrence Lhevan v.Cynthia Nichols

Petitioner:	Michael Lawrence Lhevan
Respondent:	Cynthia Nichols
Case Number:	8:2016cv01240
Filed:	July 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge:	George H. Wu
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 1, 2020	Filing 95 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 94 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in these two matters is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
July 14, 2016	Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On July 5, 2016, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("Petition'). For the reasons discussedbelow, the Court orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before August 12, 2016, why this Court should not recommend dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 1, 2020

Filing 95 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 94 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in these two matters is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)

July 14, 2016

Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. On July 5, 2016, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ("Petition'). For the reasons discussedbelow, the Court orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before August 12, 2016, why this Court should not recommend dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michael Lawrence Lhevan v.Cynthia Nichols
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Lawrence Lhevan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Cynthia Nichols
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?