Styles for Less, Inc. v. RSC Insurance Brokerage, Inc. et al
| Styles for Less, Inc. |
| Does, RSC Insurance Brokerage, Inc, RSUI Indemnity Company and Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| 8:2016cv01324 |
| July 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| James V. Selna |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 111 by Judge James V. Selna. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 76 . (kh)
|
|
Filing
72
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that; the Court having determined pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54(b) that there is no just reason for delay, the Order of this Court dated December 15, 2016 (Docket No. 67 ) is a final judgment in this action as to Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company; that Plaintiff Styles For Less, Inc. take nothing against Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company; and that Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company be dismissed from this action with prejudice on the merits. (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
