James Michael Crawford v. County of Orange et al
| James Michael Crawford |
| Dillon P Alley, County of Orange and Does |
| 8:2016cv01503 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff James Michael Crawford will have Judgment entered in his favor and against Defendant County of Orange and Defendant/Counterclaimant Dillon P. Alley in th e amount of $15,215.88; 2. Defendant/Counterclaimant Dillon P. Alley will have Judgment entered in his favor and against Plaintiff James Michael Crawford in the amount of $261,400.00; 3. The prevailing party(ies) may recover their costs of suit in accordance with applicable law; and 4. That this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. In light of the Non-Opposition filed by Plaintiff's counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court now adopts Defendants' Proposed Order for Protective Order 44 and enters the same as an ORDER of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
