Bill Justesen v. Online Marketing Group, LLC et al
Bill Justesen |
Doe Individuals and Online Marketing Group, LLC |
8:2016cv01546 |
August 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jay C. Gandhi |
Josephine L. Staton |
Other Statutory Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than February 16, 2017, 5:00 p.m., why this case shou ld not be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. (see document for details). (dro) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than October 20 2016, why this case should not be di smissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. (see document for details). (dro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.