Michael Fries v. Ms. K. D. Harris et al
| Michael Fries |
| Dir. of CDCR Beard, Warden of KVSP Biter, Ms. K. D. Harris, Dir. of CDCR Kernan and Warden of KVSP Pfeifer |
| 8:2016cv01687 |
| September 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Order 11 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick.Because it appears from the face of the Petition that Petittioner's claims may be time-barred, IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that, on or before October 21, 2016, Petitioner show cause in w riting as to why the Court should not recommend that this action be summarily dismissed with prejudice on the ground of untimeliness. Petitioner is specifically ordered to identify whether he is arguing that a later trigger date should apply und er 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B), (C), or (D), and all facts that support such an argument. Petitioner is also ordered to identify any period for which statutory or equitable tolling is claimed, and all facts to support any such claim. (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
