Vincent Romero v. County of San Bernardino et al
Vincent Romero |
Robert Burk, Donna Conway, County of San Bernardino, Jo Lou Craig, DOES, Nichole Diggs, San Bernardino Department of Child Support Services and Angelo Tevez |
8:2016cv01872 |
October 11, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Valerie Baker Fairbank |
Karen L. Stevenson |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 11 : The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. The Court will not issue a final judgment at this time. P laintiff MAY FILE a motion to reinstate this case on or before Friday, May 16, 2017. If plaintiff fails to file any reinstatement motion, files an untimely reinstatement motion, or files a timely but unpersuasive reinstatement motion, then on Tuesday, May 30, 2017 this Court will convert this dismissal from without-prejudice to with-prejudice without further opportunity for objection or argument. (rh) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/16/2017. Plaintiff is advised that the failure to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of his case pursuant to Rules 4(m) and 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 41-1. (rh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.