Murad, LLC v. Dinh Nguyen

Murad, LLC v. Dinh Nguyen

Plaintiff:	Murad, LLC
Defendant:	Dinh Nguyen
Case Number:	8:2016cv02123
Filed:	November 29, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge:	Douglas F. McCormick
Nature of Suit:	Trademark

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 10, 2017	Filing 27 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court enters judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant. Defendant and any of his agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, in active concert and participation with him (the "Enjoined Parties"), are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as follows: Refer to Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
January 17, 2017	Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 31, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: (see document for details). (dro)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 10, 2017

Filing 27 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court enters judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant. Defendant and any of his agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, in active concert and participation with him (the "Enjoined Parties"), are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as follows: Refer to Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

January 17, 2017

Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 31, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: (see document for details). (dro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murad, LLC v. Dinh Nguyen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Murad, LLC
Represented By:	Adam Corey Sherman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dinh Nguyen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?