United States of America v. Real Property Located Temecula, California
| United States of America |
| Real Property Located in Douglas City, California, Real Property Located in Fountain Valley, California and Real Property Located in Temecula, California |
| 8:2016cv02129 |
| November 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Karen E. Scott |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER (1) DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE SOLELY AND ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA; AND (2) RECOGNIZING THAT DEFENDANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA IS FORFEITED TO THE GOVERNMENT DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF $360,000.00 TO THE GOVERNMENT 51 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this action is dismissed with prejudice solely and only as to the defendant Real Property Located In Fountain Valley, California. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
|
Filing
44
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE AS TO DEFENDANT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ONLY 43 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES as follows: On or before December 1, 2018, J. Bui shall pay to the gov ernment, by wire transfer or another form acceptable to the government in the governments sole discretion, the sum of $360,000.00, which sum shall be the substitute res for the Defendant Temecula Property, forfeited to the government, and disposed of by the government in accordance with law. (iv)
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff's counsel, to show cause in writing no later than January 19, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
