Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation et al v. GSF Enterprises, Inc. et al
Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation |
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, Does, John Cunningham Dunbar, GSF Enterprises, Inc. and Gary Aldo Viano |
8:2017cv00115 |
January 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O. Carter |
Jay C. Gandhi |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that CARPENTERS SOUTHWEST ADMINISTRATIVE CORPORATION and BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE CARPENTERS SOUTHWEST TRUSTS have judgment as follows: AS TO CARPENTERS SOUTHWEST ADMINIST RATIVE CORPORATION and BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE CARPENTERSSOUTHWEST TRUSTS FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF AGAINST GSF ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation, dba GOLDEN STATE FRAMERS: Unpaid contributions $108,553.55; Liquidated damages 29,361.66; Interest on the unpaid contributions pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2) 9,382.75; and Attorneys fees and costs 6,545.95 for a GRAND TOTAL $153,843.91 (lwag) |
Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than, June 1, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (see document for details). (dro) |
Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge David O. Carter. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than April 28, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (see document for details). (dro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.