John Ho v. Mendez Automotive Services, Inc.
John Ho |
Mendez Automotive Services, Inc. |
Michael G Balmages |
8:2017cv00222 |
February 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jay C Gandhi |
James V Selna |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, re Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice #23 . Pursuant to the parties' "Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice," and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorney's fees. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement terms between the parties. IT IS SO ORDERED (dro) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff John Ho. Dismissal is with Prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 22 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT OF CASE by Judge James V. Selna. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (es) |
Filing 21 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Michael G Balmages: Mediation held on 12/20/17 and the case has been completely settled. With the filing of this Report, the parties are advised that they must notify the trial judge's deputy courtroom clerk of the fact of settlement and to promptly file documents regarding the final disposition of the case. Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Balmages, Michael) |
Filing 20 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS the Scheduling Conference continued to MONDAY, 1/8/2018 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Court Reporter: Sharon Seffens. (kt) |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Michael G Balmages has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (mb) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties request that the ADR Program assign a Panel Mediator from the following area of law: ADA and Unruh Civil Rights Act. Filed by Plaintiff John Ho(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 17 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge James V. Selna. The Court discharges the Order to Show Cause to the plaintiff issued 8/21/2017. The Court and counsel confer. The Court stays the matter for 60 days for the parties to engage conduct a settlement conference. The Court resets the Scheduling Conference to Monday, 11/6/2017 at 11:30 am. Court Reporter: Sharon Seffens. (kt) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff John Hoto Show Cause Hearing,, Set/Reset Hearing, #15 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 15 MINUTES OF Show Cause Hearing and Order Continuing Scheduling Conference held before Judge James V. Selna. Cause called and counsel for defendant makes his appearance. The Court notes that there is no appearance on behalf of plaintiff in this action. The Court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing not later than Tuesday, September 5, 2017. Scheduling Conference Continued to 9/11/2017 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. Court Reporter: Sharon Seffens. (twdb) |
Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2-3 days, filed by Plaintiff John Ho.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING RULE 26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge James V. Selna. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/14/2017. Scheduling Conference set for 8/21/2017 at 11:30 AM before Judge James V. Selna. (jlen) |
Filing 12 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA. (jlen) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mendez Automotive Services, Inc..(Attorney Harry S Carmack added to party Mendez Automotive Services, Inc.(pty:dft))(Carmack, Harry) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mendez Automotive Services, Inc.. (lwag) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #8 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Attorney's address listed on Summons is incorrect. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ig) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of address by Pamela Tsao attorney for Plaintiff John Ho. Changing attorneys address to 17802 Irvine Blvd., Suite A117, Tustin, CA 92780. Filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Ho, (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-19326627 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party John Ho(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.