Young Hee Park v. Armando Perez et al
Young Hee Park |
Andrew Chiao, Does and Armando Perez |
8:2017cv00335 |
February 27, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andrew J. Guilford |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, in favor of Young Hee Park against Andrew Chiao in the amount of $12,625.00. Additionally, Defendant Andrew Chiao is ordered to provide accessible parking spaces at the property located at 12083 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove, California, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment 24 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb) |
Filing 19 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than December 29, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before that date one of the following: A proof of proper service of the summons and complaint on Defendant(s); Papers properly seeking entry of default or a default judgment; or Answers or other filings by Defendant(s). (es) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.