Ronale Bea-Mone, III v. Silverstein Eviction Law Offices
| Ronale Bea-Mone, III |
| Silverstein Eviction Law Offices |
| 8:2017cv00550 |
| March 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F. McCormick |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
118
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER by Judge Josephine L. Staton, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Ronale Bea-Mone III and against Defendant Steven D. Silverstein as follows: (1) Statutory damage s in the amount of $1,000.00 pursuant to 15 USC 1692k(a) (2)(A); (2) Attorney's fees and non-taxable costs in the amount of $95,732.54 pursuant to 15 USC 1692k(a)(3); and (3) Taxable costs in the amount of $1,380.35 pursuant to 28 USC 1920. (jp)
|
|
Filing
102
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Pursuant to the Jury's Special Verdict (Doc. 91), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered for $1,000.00 in favor of Plaintiff Ronale Bea-Mone III and against Defendant Steven D. Silverstein. Pursuant to Local Rule 54-10, Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees must be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after the entry of this final judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
|
|
Filing
60
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton. On May 11, 2018, the Court held oral argument on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Refile Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 56.) Plaintiff's couns el did not appear for the hearing. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff's counsel to show cause, in writing, (1) why counsel failed to appear; and (2) why counsel should not be sanctioned in the form of payment of Defendant's attorney fees for his time spent attending the hearing. Plaintiff's counsel's response is due within five (5) days of this Order. (dro)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge Josephine L. Staton: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Counsel is hereby ordered to show cause in writing no later than May 30, 2017, why thi s case should not be dismissed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41, for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. See document for further information. (dv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ronale Bea-Mone, III v. Silverstein Eviction Law Offices | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronale Bea-Mone, III | |
| Represented By: | Elliot Albert Rosenberger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Silverstein Eviction Law Offices | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
