David Darsow v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
| David Darsow |
| Does and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association |
| 8:2017cv00604 |
| April 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D. Early |
| Josephine L. Staton |
| Real Property: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court gave Plaintiff twenty-one days to file a First Amended Complaint and noted that "[failure to timely file a First Amended Complaint in conformity with this Order may result in the dismissal of this action." Plaintiff has not filed a First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION). (jp)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ("OSC") and ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. No later than July 21, 2017, Plaintiff shall file a separate written response explaining why he failed to comply with the Court's Order. Failure to respond to this OSC may result in a dismissal for failure to prosecute. The Court CONTINUES the June 30, 2017 Scheduling Conference to July 28, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. (see document for details). (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
